IND AS 117 replaces IND AS 104 and brings India's insurance accounting fully in line with IFRS 17 — one of the most significant changes to financial reporting for insurers in decades. Where IND AS 104 was largely a placeholder that permitted existing practices to continue, IND AS 117 introduces a single consistent framework for measuring and presenting all insurance contracts.

For CAs, CFOs and finance teams at insurance companies, banks with insurance subsidiaries, and non-insurance entities that issue insurance contracts (e.g. warranty providers, credit insurers), this standard demands a complete rethink of how premiums are recognised, how liabilities are measured, and what the P&L actually represents.

Effective date (India): IND AS 117 is expected to be effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 April 2026 (FY 2026-27), subject to MCA notification. IFRS 17 is already effective globally from 1 January 2023. Entities should be in parallel-run mode now.

1. What is IND AS 117 and Why Does it Matter?

IND AS 117 is India's accounting standard for insurance contracts. It prescribes how an insurer (or any entity issuing insurance contracts) must:

The most profound change is in revenue recognition. Under IND AS 104, insurers essentially recognised premiums received as revenue. Under IND AS 117, premium received is not revenue — it is a liability. Revenue is recognised only as the insurer performs by providing insurance coverage over time.

The big shift: IND AS 117 moves insurance accounting from a cash/premium-based model to a services-rendered model — similar in philosophy to how IND AS 115 treats revenue from long-term contracts.

2. Scope — What Contracts Are Covered?

IND AS 117 applies to three types of contracts:

Contract TypeDescriptionExample
Insurance contracts issuedOne party accepts significant insurance risk from another by agreeing to compensate the policyholder if a specified uncertain future event adversely affects themMotor, health, life, fire, liability
Reinsurance contracts heldInsurance contracts where the entity is the policyholder (cedant) purchasing reinsuranceTreaty and facultative reinsurance purchased
Investment contracts with DPFFinancial instruments where the holder receives guaranteed amounts plus a discretionary share of surplusWith-profit policies, bonus endowment plans

What is Insurance Risk?

A contract transfers significant insurance risk if the insurer could suffer a significant loss in a scenario where the insured event occurs — even if that scenario is unlikely. The test is qualitative, not quantitative (no bright-line threshold).

Not in scope: Product warranties issued by manufacturers (IND AS 37), financial guarantee contracts (IND AS 109), and fixed-fee service contracts that transfer no insurance risk.

3. Key Concepts: FCF, RA and CSM

Three building blocks underpin IND AS 117 liability measurement. Understanding these is essential before approaching the three models.

Fulfilment Cash Flows (FCF)

FCF represents the insurer's best estimate of what it will actually pay and receive under the contracts, discounted to present value. It has two components:

Contractual Service Margin (CSM)

The CSM is the unearned profit the insurer expects to make from the group of contracts. It is recognised in profit or loss as insurance revenue as the insurer renders services (provides coverage) over the coverage period.

Insurance Contract Liability at Inception
Liability = FCF + CSM
where FCF = PVFCF + Risk Adjustment

At inception (profitable group): CSM = −FCF
∴ Net liability at inception = 0

At inception (loss-making group): FCF > 0 → onerous contract loss to P&L immediately

Key insight: A profitable insurance contract creates zero net liability at inception — the CSM exactly offsets the negative FCF. The profit sits in the CSM and is released to P&L over the coverage period. Under IND AS 104, premiums often created immediate profit on day one.

4. The Three Measurement Models

IND AS 117 provides three measurement approaches. The appropriate model depends on the nature and duration of the contracts.

DEFAULT

General Measurement Model (GMM) — Building Block Approach

Full FCF + CSM measurement. Used for long-duration contracts where time value of money is significant.

  • Life insurance (term, endowment, whole life, ULIPs)
  • Long-term health and critical illness
  • Annuities and pension products
SIMPLIFICATION

Premium Allocation Approach (PAA)

Simplified liability using unearned premium. Available when coverage period ≤ 12 months, or when PAA results do not materially differ from GMM.

  • Motor, fire, marine, health (annual policies)
  • Most general insurance lines
  • Short-duration group covers
PARTICIPATING CONTRACTS

Variable Fee Approach (VFA)

Modified GMM for contracts where policyholders share in returns on underlying items. Changes in the entity's share of underlying item fair values adjust the CSM rather than P&L.

  • With-profit policies
  • Participating endowment plans
  • Unit-linked plans with significant insurance risk

5. GMM — General Measurement Model in Detail

Under the GMM, the insurance contract liability is updated at every reporting date through a prescribed roll-forward:

GMM Liability Roll-Forward (each period)
Opening Liability (FCF + CSM)
+ New contracts added to the group
+ Interest accreted on FCF at locked-in discount rate
+ Interest accreted on CSM at locked-in discount rate
± Changes in FCF for future service → adjust CSM (not P&L)
± Changes in FCF for past/current service → P&L immediately
− CSM released to P&L (insurance revenue for services rendered)
− Claims and expenses paid
± Insurance finance income/expense (OCI or P&L per policy)
= Closing Liability

Annual Cohort Requirement

Contracts more than one year apart cannot be in the same group. This prevents profitable new business from absorbing losses of older underwriting years — each vintage is accounted for separately.

Discount Rates

IND AS 117 requires market-consistent rates reflecting the characteristics of the insurance contract cash flows — not the insurer's own credit risk. Indian insurers typically use the government securities yield curve plus an illiquidity premium for non-liquid long-term liabilities. The locked-in rate at inception is used for CSM accretion and to differentiate FCF changes that affect the CSM (future service) from those that go to P&L (past service).

6. PAA — Premium Allocation Approach

The PAA is a simplification for short-duration contracts. It works similarly to the unearned premium reserve model under IND AS 104 — but with key differences in how claims liabilities are measured.

Liability for Remaining Coverage (LRC)

PAA — Liability for Remaining Coverage
LRC = Premium received
− Acquisition costs expensed (or deferred if > 12 months)
− Insurance revenue recognised to date
+ Onerous contract adjustment (if applicable)

Insurance Revenue per period = LRC released as coverage is provided
(straight-line unless risk pattern is materially different)

Liability for Incurred Claims (LIC)

Once a claim is incurred, it moves to the LIC — which must be measured using full FCF (PV of expected future claim payments plus risk adjustment). The PAA simplification applies only to remaining coverage, not to claims already incurred.

Practical note: For most Indian general insurers with annual motor, fire and health policies, the PAA will be the primary model. The accounting closely resembles current practice, making this the lower-effort transition for short-tail lines.

7. VFA — Variable Fee Approach

The VFA applies to participating contracts where the insurer's obligation is to pay the policyholder a share of returns from a specified pool of underlying items, minus the insurer's variable fee for providing the insurance coverage.

The critical difference from GMM: changes in the fair value of the insurer's share of underlying items adjust the CSM — they do not go to P&L immediately, because the insurer's obligation moves symmetrically with asset returns shared with policyholders. This eliminates artificial P&L volatility from investment market movements.

Why VFA? In a with-profit life policy, if the investment portfolio earns 12% and the insurer shares 90% with policyholders, the higher liability exactly matches higher investment income. Routing both through the CSM ensures the insurer reports profit only from its 10% fee — not from market movements it passes straight through.

8. Insurance Revenue vs Premium Received

Under IND AS 117, premium received is not revenue — it is a deposit. Insurance revenue is a derived figure, built up from the liability roll-forward:

Revenue ComponentWhat it represents
Expected claims & expenses in the periodCost of insurance services provided — transferred from liability to P&L as coverage is given
Risk Adjustment releasedRA that is no longer needed as risk period passes
CSM releasedProfit earned as insurance services are rendered (coverage days lapse)
Acquisition cost amortisationDeferred acquisition costs expensed as coverage is provided
Insurance revenue ≠ premiums collected. It is derived from the liability roll-forward, not from cash flows.

Insurance service expenses include incurred claims, changes in LIC, and FCF changes for past or current service. The net of revenue and service expenses is the insurance service result — the underwriting profit or loss.

Insurance finance income/expense — the effect of unwinding the discount on insurance liabilities — is presented separately, in P&L or OCI depending on entity policy choice.

9. Worked Example 1: Motor Insurance (PAA)

Facts: Shiv General Insurance issues a motor policy on 1 October 2025. Annual premium: ₹12,000. Policy period: 1 Oct 2025 – 30 Sep 2026. Acquisition cost (commission): ₹600. FY end: 31 March 2026. No claims in H1.

At inception — 1 October 2025

Journal Entry — Premium received
₹12,000
₹12,000
Journal Entry — Acquisition cost paid
₹600
₹600

FY end — 31 March 2026 (6 months of coverage provided = 50%)

Insurance revenue = 50% × ₹12,000 = ₹6,000
Acquisition cost amortised = 50% × ₹600 = ₹300

Journal Entry — Revenue recognition (H1)
₹6,000
₹6,000
Journal Entry — Acquisition cost amortisation
₹300
₹300

Balance Sheet at 31 March 2026

ItemAmount
LRC: ₹12,000 − ₹6,000 revenue recognised₹6,000
Deferred acquisition cash flow: ₹600 − ₹300(₹300) asset
Net insurance contract liability₹5,700

Key point: The insurer collected ₹12,000 but recognised only ₹6,000 as insurance revenue in H1. The remaining ₹6,000 stays in the LRC until H2 when coverage is provided. Under IND AS 104, the treatment of unearned premium was similar — making the PAA the least disruptive transition for general insurers.

10. Worked Example 2: Life Insurance (GMM)

Facts: Param Life Insurance issues a 5-year term life policy on 1 April 2025. Annual premium: ₹10,000. Sum assured: ₹5,00,000. PV of expected claims: ₹18,000. PV of expected expenses: ₹4,000. Risk Adjustment: ₹3,000. Acquisition cost: ₹2,000. Locked-in discount rate: 7% p.a.

Step 1 — Calculate FCF and CSM at inception

Day 1 Calculation
PV of future premiums (inflows) = ₹41,002 (₹10,000 annuity, 5yr @ 7%)
PV of future claims + expenses (outflows) = ₹22,000 (₹18,000 + ₹4,000)
Net PVFCF = ₹41,002 − ₹22,000 = +₹19,002 (surplus)
Risk Adjustment = ₹3,000
FCF (net of RA) = −₹19,002 + ₹3,000 = −₹16,002
Add: Acquisition cost (outflow) = +₹2,000
Adjusted FCF = −₹14,002

CSM at inception = +₹14,002 (to bring net liability = 0)
Insurance contract liability Day 1 = −₹14,002 + ₹14,002 = ₹0
Journal Entry — Day 1 Recognition (1 April 2025)
₹10,000
₹2,000
₹12,000
₹14,002
₹14,002

In practice, the FCF asset and FCF liability net within a single insurance contract line. The above is expanded for educational clarity.

Step 2 — Year 1 CSM release (31 March 2026)

CSM is released to revenue based on coverage units. For a 5-year term policy with uniform risk profile, 1/5 is released each year.

CSM release Year 1 = ₹14,002 ÷ 5 = ₹2,800

Journal Entry — Annual CSM release to revenue
₹2,800
₹2,800

Year 1 Insurance Service Result (simplified)

P&L ItemYear 1
Insurance Revenue — expected claims & expenses (1/5 of ₹22,000)₹4,400
Insurance Revenue — RA released (1/5 of ₹3,000)₹600
Insurance Revenue — CSM released₹2,800
Insurance Revenue — acq. cost amortised (1/5 of ₹2,000)₹400
Total Insurance Revenue₹8,200
Insurance Service Expenses — claims & expenses incurred(₹4,400)
Insurance Service Expenses — acq. cost amortised(₹400)
Insurance Service Result (underwriting profit)₹3,400

Key observation: The insurer collected ₹10,000 in premium but recognised only ₹8,200 as insurance revenue in Year 1. The underwriting profit of ₹3,400 reflects the profit on one year of service provided — not the full expected profit of the policy. The remaining CSM of ₹11,202 (₹14,002 − ₹2,800) is released over Years 2–5.

11. IND AS 117 vs IND AS 104 — Key Differences

AspectIND AS 104IND AS 117
RevenuePremium received (less unearned)Services rendered; premium is a liability
Liability measurementExisting practices largely continuedFulfilment Cash Flows + CSM
Discount ratesOften historical/static ratesCurrent market rates, updated each period
Profit at inceptionCould be recognised immediatelyDeferred in CSM; released as services rendered
Loss at inceptionOften deferred or spreadRecognised immediately (onerous contract)
Risk adjustmentNot explicitExplicitly measured and disclosed
Finance income/expenseNot separately presentedExplicitly separated; OCI option available
DisclosuresLimitedExtensive — CSM reconciliation, sensitivities, claims development

12. Transition Approaches

IND AS 117 offers three transition methods. The choice significantly affects opening retained earnings and the CSM brought forward.

1

Full Retrospective Approach

Apply IND AS 117 as if it had always been in force. Requires historical data going back to each contract's inception. Produces the most comparable information but is data-intensive — often impractical for contracts issued more than 5–10 years ago.

2

Modified Retrospective Approach

Available only where full retrospective is impracticable. Uses specific permitted simplifications to estimate the CSM at transition without full reconstruction. Specific modifications are permitted for the discount rate, RA, and CSM.

3

Fair Value Approach

CSM at transition = Fair value of contracts at transition date minus FCF at transition date. The fair value is determined per IND AS 113. This avoids looking back entirely but requires actuarial fair valuation of the in-force book — typically using embedded value techniques.

Practical guidance: Most Indian insurers will use modified retrospective or fair value for older cohorts (insufficient data for full retrospective) and full retrospective for recent cohorts. The approach can differ by portfolio — it need not be uniform across the entire book.

13. Key Disclosures

IND AS 117 (Paragraphs 93–132) requires far more disclosure than IND AS 104. The core disclosures include:

Audit risk area: The CSM reconciliation is the most scrutinised disclosure. It must explain every movement — new contracts, experience variances, changes in estimates, releases to revenue, finance adjustments, and foreign exchange. Errors in CSM tracking are the highest-frequency misstatement in IFRS 17 implementations globally.

IND AS Tools for CAs and Finance Teams

Explore our IND AS 116 lease accounting calculators, IND AS 109 ECL provision matrix, multi-lease portfolio and income tax calculators — all built for CA-grade audit workpapers.

Explore IND AS Tools →