1. What IND AS 40 Covers — Objective and Definition
IND AS 40 prescribes the accounting treatment for investment property and related disclosure requirements. Investment property is land or a building (or part of a building), or both, held by the owner or by a lessee as a right-of-use asset, to earn rentals or for capital appreciation, or both — rather than for use in the production or supply of goods or services, for administrative purposes (owner-occupied property, governed by IND AS 16), or for sale in the ordinary course of business (inventory, governed by IND AS 2).
2. Classification — Investment Property vs Owner-Occupied vs Inventory
The classification hinges entirely on the purpose for which the property is held, not its physical characteristics:
| Purpose | Classification | Governing standard |
|---|---|---|
| Held to earn rentals or capital appreciation | Investment property | IND AS 40 |
| Used in production/supply of goods/services or for administration | Owner-occupied property | IND AS 16 |
| Held for sale in the ordinary course of business, or being constructed/developed for sale | Inventory | IND AS 2 |
| Being constructed or developed for future use as investment property | Investment property under construction | IND AS 40 |
Property leased to another group entity under an operating lease and held by that group entity as owner-occupied doesn't qualify as investment property in the consolidated financial statements (since from the group's perspective it's owner-occupied), even though it may qualify as investment property in the lessor's own separate financial statements.
3. Dual-Use Property and Ancillary Services
Dual-use property: if the portions held to earn rentals/capital appreciation and the portion used for the entity's own operations could be sold or leased out separately (e.g. under a strata title), each portion is accounted for separately. If the portions cannot be sold separately, the property is investment property only if an insignificant portion is used for the entity's own purposes.
Ancillary services: when an entity provides services to the occupants of a property it holds, the classification depends on how significant those services are. Where the services are a relatively insignificant component of the arrangement as a whole — e.g. security and common-area maintenance for tenants of a leased office building — the property remains investment property. Where the services are significant — e.g. a hotel where guest services are integral to the operation — the property is treated as owner-occupied and accounted for under IND AS 16, not as investment property.
4. Measurement — Why India Mandates the Cost Model
IAS 40 permits a choice between the cost model and the fair value model for investment property. IND AS 40 removes the fair value model entirely and mandates the cost model (cost less accumulated depreciation and accumulated impairment, following the same approach as IND AS 16) for every Indian entity, with the fair value required only as a disclosure in the notes, not for balance sheet measurement.
This is one of the most consequential India-specific carve-outs (a "carve-out" in the Ind AS convergence process) from IFRS in the entire framework. It exists because the fair value model depends on there being a sufficiently active, transparent, and independently verifiable real estate market — conditions that don't exist uniformly across India's diverse property markets — so mandating cost avoids inconsistent, hard-to-audit fair value estimates driving reported profit or loss volatility.
5. Transfers To and From Investment Property
A transfer to or from investment property is made only when there is an actual change in use, evidenced by:
- Commencement of owner-occupation — transfer from investment property to owner-occupied property (IND AS 16)
- Commencement of development with a view to sale — transfer to inventory (IND AS 2)
- End of owner-occupation — transfer from owner-occupied property to investment property
- Commencement of an operating lease to a third party — transfer from inventory to investment property
Because India uses the cost model exclusively, a transfer generally does not change the carrying amount of the property being transferred, and doesn't change the cost for the purposes of subsequent measurement or disclosure — the property simply moves between balance sheet captions at its existing net book value, with depreciation continuing on the same basis (or starting, if newly reclassified from inventory) going forward.
6. Worked Example — Classification and a Transfer
Scenario: Meridian Realty Ltd owns a 6-storey commercial building. Floors 1-3 are leased out to unrelated tenants under operating leases with only routine security/maintenance services provided; floors 4-6 house Meridian's own head office. The floors are on separate strata titles and could each be sold independently. The building's total carrying amount is ₹1,80,00,000, split equally ₹30,00,000 per floor.
Step 1 — Classify Each Portion
| Floors | Use | Classification | Carrying amount (₹) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-3 (leased to tenants) | Earning rentals; only insignificant ancillary services | Investment property (IND AS 40) | 90,00,000 |
| 4-6 (own head office) | Administrative use | Owner-occupied (IND AS 16) | 90,00,000 |
Because the floors are on separate strata titles and could be sold independently, the building is split — floors 1-3 as investment property at ₹90,00,000, and floors 4-6 remaining as PP&E at ₹90,00,000. Both continue to be measured at cost less accumulated depreciation, since India mandates the cost model regardless of classification.
Step 2 — A Later Transfer
Two years later, Meridian vacates floors 4-6 and leases them out to a new tenant as well. At that point, the carrying amount of floors 4-6 (say, ₹82,00,000 after two years' depreciation) is transferred from PP&E to investment property at that existing carrying amount — no revaluation gain or fair value adjustment is recognised on the transfer, precisely because the cost model applies to both classifications.
Explore Finosutra's IND AS tools
Free calculators for lease accounting, security deposits, ECL provisioning and financial statement generation — audit-ready workpapers in minutes.
Explore IND AS Tools →7. IND AS 40 vs Old IGAAP (AS 13) — Key Differences
| Aspect | Old IGAAP (AS 13) | IND AS 40 |
|---|---|---|
| Dedicated investment property standard | No separate standard — investment property accounted for within the general "Accounting for Investments" framework, generally at cost less impairment | Dedicated standard with an explicit definition, classification tests, and transfer rules |
| Fair value model | Not applicable / not a formal option in the old framework | Explicitly excluded even though IAS 40 permits it — cost model mandated |
| Dual-use and ancillary-service classification tests | No explicit guidance | Detailed classification guidance for dual-use property and properties with ancillary services |
| Transfer accounting | Less structured guidance | Explicit transfer triggers (change in use) and cost-carryover mechanics |
| Disclosures | Limited | Requires fair value disclosure in the notes even though cost model is used for measurement |
8. Disclosures Required
Even though investment property is measured at cost, IND AS 40 requires disclosure of its fair value in the notes (except in the rare cases where fair value cannot be reliably determined, which must itself be explained). Other required disclosures include the methods and assumptions applied in estimating fair value, the depreciation method and useful lives/rates used, the gross carrying amount and accumulated depreciation at the beginning and end of the period, a reconciliation of the carrying amount showing additions, disposals, depreciation, transfers to/from other classifications, and impairment losses, and the existence and amounts of any restrictions on realisability or on the remittance of income and disposal proceeds.
9. Common Mistakes CAs Make
Error 1 — Applying the fair value model because "that's what IFRS/IAS 40 allows." This is one carve-out where Indian practice deliberately diverges from full IFRS — the fair value model is simply not an available option for Indian entities under IND AS 40, however common it may be internationally.
Error 2 — Classifying a hotel property as investment property because it earns rental-like income. Where the owner provides significant ancillary services integral to guests' stay (housekeeping, F&B, concierge), the property is owner-occupied under IND AS 16, not investment property, regardless of how the income is framed.
Error 3 — Recognising a gain or loss on a transfer between classifications. Since both investment property and owner-occupied property use the cost model, a transfer simply carries the existing net book value across to the new caption — there's no fair value step-up or write-down to book at the transfer date.
Error 4 — Not splitting a dual-use property that could genuinely be sold in separate parts. Where portions are separable (e.g. distinct strata titles or clearly demarcated floors that could be independently sold or leased), each portion should be classified on its own merits rather than the whole building being forced into a single category.
Error 5 — Omitting the fair value disclosure because the cost model is used for measurement. The fair value disclosure requirement is independent of the measurement model — it must still be disclosed in the notes even though it plays no role in the balance sheet carrying amount.
10. FAQs
What is investment property under IND AS 40?
Investment property is land or a building (or part of a building), or both, held by the owner or a lessee as a right-of-use asset, to earn rentals or for capital appreciation, or both — rather than for use in the production or supply of goods or services, for administrative purposes, or for sale in the ordinary course of business.
Why does IND AS 40 only permit the cost model, unlike IAS 40?
IAS 40 permits a choice between the cost model and the fair value model for investment property. IND AS 40 carves out the fair value model entirely and mandates the cost model for all Indian entities, requiring only fair value disclosure in the notes. This carve-out was made because a sufficiently active, reliable real estate market with consistent, independently verifiable valuations does not exist uniformly across India, which the fair value model depends on.
How is a dual-use property classified under IND AS 40?
If the portions used to earn rentals/capital appreciation and the portion used for the entity's own operations could be sold or leased out separately, each portion is accounted for separately — the rented-out portion as investment property, the owner-occupied portion as property, plant and equipment. If the portions cannot be sold separately, the property is investment property only if an insignificant portion is held for the entity's own use.
Does providing ancillary services affect investment property classification?
It depends on how significant the services are to the arrangement as a whole. If the services provided to occupants are a relatively insignificant component (e.g. security and maintenance services for the lessees of an office building), the property is still investment property. If the services provided are significant (e.g. a hotel managed by the owner, where guest services are integral to the business), the property is owner-occupied and accounted for as property, plant and equipment under IND AS 16, not as investment property.
How is a transfer to or from investment property accounted for?
A transfer is made only when there is a genuine change in use, evidenced by the start or end of owner-occupation, the start of development for sale, or the start of a lease to a third party. Because India uses the cost model, a transfer between investment property and owner-occupied property or inventory generally does not change the carrying amount of the property being transferred, nor the cost for subsequent measurement — it simply moves between balance sheet captions at its existing carrying amount.
Is IND AS 40 the same as IAS 40?
IND AS 40 is India's converged version of IAS 40 with one major carve-out: IAS 40 allows a choice between the cost model and the fair value model, while IND AS 40 mandates the cost model for all Indian entities, requiring fair value to be disclosed in the notes rather than used for measurement. In every other respect — the definition of investment property, the classification tests for dual-use and serviced property, and the transfer rules — the two standards are aligned.