1. What IND AS 20 Covers — Objective and Scope
IND AS 20 prescribes the accounting for, and disclosure of, government grants and other forms of government assistance. It applies to grants and assistance from government, government agencies and similar bodies, whether local, national or international — a highly relevant standard given the growth of India's PLI (Production Linked Incentive) schemes, capital subsidies, interest subvention schemes, and export incentives.
2. Recognition Criteria
A government grant is recognised only when there is reasonable assurance that: (a) the entity will comply with any conditions attached to the grant, and (b) the grant will actually be received. Recognising a grant simply because cash has been received does not, on its own, provide conclusive evidence that the conditions have been (or will be) satisfied — that assurance must exist independently.
3. The Income Approach vs the Capital Approach
| Approach | Treatment | Permitted under IND AS 20? |
|---|---|---|
| Capital approach | Grant credited directly to shareholders' equity, bypassing profit or loss | Not permitted |
| Income approach | Grant recognised in profit or loss over the periods that match it with the costs it's intended to compensate | Required |
The reasoning: a government grant does not come from shareholders, so crediting it directly to equity, bypassing profit or loss, isn't an appropriate way to account for it — it should be recognised as income in the periods that bear the related costs, on a systematic basis.
4. Grants Related to Assets — The Deferred Income Method
A grant related to a depreciable asset must be presented as deferred income, recognised in profit or loss on a systematic basis over the useful life of the asset, matched against the depreciation charge on that asset. IND AS 20 does not permit the alternative presentation (allowed under some other frameworks) of deducting the grant directly from the asset's carrying amount — India's converged standard mandates deferred income presentation only.
5. Grants Related to Income
A grant related to income (e.g. compensation for costs already incurred, or an operating subsidy) is presented either as a separate credit under a general heading such as "other income," or as a deduction from the related expense it compensates. Both presentations are acceptable, provided the choice is applied consistently and disclosed.
6. Non-Monetary Government Grants
A government grant may take the form of a non-monetary asset, such as land or other resources, given for the entity's use. In such cases, both the asset and the grant are usually recorded at the fair value of the non-monetary asset — though recording both the asset and the grant at a nominal amount is also permitted.
7. Repayment of Government Grants
A government grant that becomes repayable is accounted for as a change in accounting estimate under IND AS 8:
Grant related to income
The repayment is applied first against any unamortised deferred credit for the grant; any excess is recognised immediately as an expense.
Grant related to an asset
The repayment increases the carrying amount of the asset (or reduces the deferred income balance). The cumulative additional depreciation that would have been recognised in profit or loss to date, absent the grant, is recognised immediately as an expense.
8. Worked Example — An Asset Grant and an Income Grant
Grant Related to an Asset — Deferred Income
Scenario: Sattva Manufacturing Ltd receives a ₹50,00,000 government capital subsidy for setting up a new plant costing ₹2,00,00,000, useful life 10 years, no residual value. Reasonable assurance of compliance exists at receipt.
Over the 10-year life, ₹20,00,000/year of depreciation is offset by ₹5,00,000/year of grant income recognised in the same systematic pattern — the plant's gross cost on the balance sheet remains at the full ₹2,00,00,000, with the deferred grant shown as a separate liability, gradually released to income.
Explore Finosutra's IND AS tools
Free calculators for lease accounting, security deposits, ECL provisioning and financial statement generation — audit-ready workpapers in minutes.
Explore IND AS Tools →Grant Related to Income
Sattva also receives ₹8,00,000 as reimbursement for employee training costs of ₹8,00,000 already incurred in the current year.
Alternatively, Sattva could present this as a separate ₹8,00,000 "other income" credit instead of netting it against the training expense — either presentation is acceptable, provided it's applied consistently.
9. IND AS 20 vs Old IGAAP (AS 12) — Key Differences
| Aspect | Old IGAAP (AS 12) | IND AS 20 |
|---|---|---|
| Capital approach | Permitted in specific circumstances (e.g. grants in the nature of promoters' contribution could be credited to capital reserve) | Not permitted at all — income approach mandatory for every grant |
| Asset grant presentation | Permitted either as deferred income or as a deduction from the asset's cost | Deferred income presentation only — deduction from asset cost is not allowed |
| Non-monetary grants | Similar principle, less prescriptive | Explicit fair value (or nominal value) measurement guidance |
| Repayment of grants | Broadly similar treatment | Explicitly framed as a change in accounting estimate under IND AS 8 |
| Disclosures | Less extensive | Requires disclosure of accounting policy, nature and extent of grants recognised, and unfulfilled conditions/contingencies |
10. Disclosures Required
An entity discloses the accounting policy adopted for government grants, including the method of presentation used in the financial statements; the nature and extent of government grants recognised, including an indication of other forms of government assistance from which the entity has directly benefited; and unfulfilled conditions and other contingencies attaching to government assistance that has been recognised.
11. Common Mistakes CAs Make
Error 1 — Crediting a capital subsidy directly to a capital reserve without routing it through profit or loss. The capital approach isn't available under IND AS 20 — every government grant must ultimately flow through profit or loss via the income approach.
Error 2 — Netting an asset-related grant against the asset's cost. IND AS 20 requires the deferred income presentation for asset grants — deducting the grant from the asset's carrying amount is simply not a permitted option under the Indian standard.
Error 3 — Recognising the entire grant as income in the year of receipt. A grant related to a depreciable asset must be spread over that asset's useful life, matched against depreciation — recognising it all upfront overstates income in the receipt year.
Error 4 — Recognising a grant before reasonable assurance of compliance exists. Cash receipt alone isn't sufficient — the conditions attached to the grant must be reasonably assured of being met before recognition.
Error 5 — Treating a grant repayment as a prior period error requiring restatement. A grant becoming repayable is a change in accounting estimate, applied prospectively from the date it becomes repayable — not a retrospective correction under IND AS 8's error provisions.
12. FAQs
When can a government grant be recognised under IND AS 20?
A government grant is recognised only when there is reasonable assurance that the entity will comply with any conditions attached to it, and that the grant will actually be received. Recognising it earlier, based merely on receiving the grant in cash, would ignore the risk that the conditions might not be met.
What is the difference between the income approach and the capital approach?
Under the capital approach, a grant is credited directly to shareholders' equity, bypassing profit or loss entirely. Under the income approach, a grant is recognised in profit or loss over the periods that match it with the related costs it is intended to compensate. IND AS 20 requires the income approach for all government grants — the capital approach is not permitted, since a grant does not come from shareholders and is not an appropriate item to credit directly to equity.
How is a grant related to a depreciable asset recognised?
IND AS 20 requires such grants to be presented as deferred income, recognised in profit or loss on a systematic basis over the useful life of the asset, matching it against the depreciation charge on that asset. Presenting the grant as a direct deduction from the asset's carrying amount is not permitted under IND AS 20, unlike some other frameworks that allow this as an alternative presentation.
How are grants related to income presented?
A grant related to income is presented either as a separate credit or under a general heading such as "other income," or deducted from the related expense it is intended to compensate. Both presentations are permitted, as long as the method chosen is applied consistently and disclosed.
What happens when a government grant becomes repayable?
A government grant that becomes repayable is accounted for as a change in accounting estimate under IND AS 8. For a grant related to income, the repayment is first applied against any unamortised deferred credit, with any excess recognised immediately as an expense. For a grant related to an asset, the repayment increases the carrying amount of the asset (or reduces the deferred income balance), with any resulting cumulative additional depreciation recognised immediately as an expense.
Is IND AS 20 the same as IAS 20?
IND AS 20 is India's converged version of IAS 20 and follows the same recognition criteria and income-approach requirement. The key India-specific carve-out is that IND AS 20 does not permit presenting an asset-related grant as a deduction from the asset's carrying amount — only the deferred income presentation is allowed, unlike IAS 20 which permits either presentation as a free choice.